Nursing Students or Student Nurses: What’s in a Name


Recently, Jane Dickinson drew attention to the power of the language we use in her blogs examining language and health and in her argument to replace words that shame. It reminded me of another instance of language use that I believe to be inherently harmful – referring to nursing students as student nurses. This practice has been so widely used for so long that I can imagine many gasps and reactions, such as, “Well, that’s what they are; what else should we call them?” Why not nursing students? Is there a difference? I would argue there is a great difference.

I cannot think of one other group of students, health or otherwise, that is referred to with a similar moniker. We do not speak of student doctors, student lawyers, student engineers, for example. They are medical students, law students, engineering students. The lack of parallelism is the first indication that we should examine this practice.

When I “trained” to be a Registered Nurse in a hospital in the early 1960s, student nurses made up a large proportion of the hospital’s workforce. Student nurses were identified by their caps, first having none in the first 6 months, then after the capping ceremony, a white cap. Second year students were identified with a light blue ribbon on their caps, third year meant a dark blue ribbon, until finally Registered Nurses wore the coveted black ribbon. The uniforms likewise differentiated students from Registered Nurses, with graduate nurses wearing all white and students being required to wear a blue dress, with highly starched white bib and apron – all exactly 14” from the floor, regardless of the student’s height (so in class pictures the skirts were exactly at the same length) – along with plastic collar and cuffs. Although I describe the practice of one particular hospital, similar practice were common elsewhere. Student nurses were a category of hospital worker and were, as such, as easily identifiable as housekeeping staff, candy stripers, or Registered Nurses.

I say all of this to make the point that not only did the label “student nurse” make her (with very few males at that time) identifiable, but also indicated something about her place in the organization and the expectations that organization had of her. (I will continue to refer to “her” because, although our class was unusual in that we had 2 males in our class, their uniform was white, like male Registered Nurses wore. It did not change throughout the 3-year program, and neither male students nor male Registered Nurses wore a cap or any other ranking symbol.)

The term student nurse comes from a time when nursing students were expected to be not only subservient (if a physican entered the nursing office, a student nurse who was sitting and charting, for example, was expected to rise and give the physician her seat), but also loyal, innocent and pure. The Florence Nightingale pledge, recited at graduation by the graduating classes of the time, included the promise to “pass my life in purity.”  In the first year after my graduation, I was employed as a Registered Nurse  at a secular  hospital (I ‘trained’ in a Catholic hospital) in a different Canadian province.) Yet the Director of Nursing forbade the graduating class that year from taking the pledge because she didn’t believe they had lived their lives in purity. She enjoyed the power to be able to do that!

This combination of an aura of innocence/ purity with the expectation that student nurses provided intimate care to males made “student nurses” highly desirable as dates.  Even during my student nurse years, engineering students from the local university would come to hospital schools of nursing to find dates for their dances.  Unfortunately, this also applied to nurses generally – the saying “if you can’t get a date, get a nurse” was common for years after I graduated in 1964. The frequent representation of nurses as sex objects, well documented by such authors as Kalisch and Kalisch extended to student nurses as well.

Despite the fact that nursing education has changed dramatically in the last 50 years, the term “student nurse,” with all its connotations, persists.  When I was teaching, I challenged students to refer to themselves as nursing students instead.  In class discussions on the topic, despite students’ general agreement that the connotation of “student nurse” was very different from that of nursing student, very few took up that challenge and subsequently submitted assignments in which they referred to themselves as student nurses. Some told me they were required to designate their status as S.N. when signing their charting.

I was interested in whether or not a Google images search for nursing student yielded any different result than search for student nurse images. The screen shots of the first screen that came up with each search are below.  Without a careful analysis, some differences are immediately apparent.  The top one is the screenshot of student nurse images; the second a screenshot of nursing student images.  

NM_April_6_16_copy_pagesNM_April_6_16_copy_pages

While both screenshots include some images that appear unrelated, in the top one they are images of children. There are no images of nurses practicing, and the screenshot includes images of the back of a nurse’s capped head, and the nurse as a romantic figure (Cherry Ames). The somewhat self-deprecating text message reads “ Student Nurse Diagnosis: Stress R/T: knowledge deficit, impaired memory, sleep deprivation, unbalanced nutrition, interrupted family process, lack of social interaction, disturbed energy field.”

Note the general increase in diversity and portrayal of adult nurses providing care in the second picture. The unrelated shots appear to depict Go-Kart racing. The text image, giving the same stress diagnosis, makes its point without self-degradation: “Diagnosis: Just a tad stressed r/t complete academic overload, depleted resources, little or no life.

It seems to me that the collages support the argument that the term student nurse has a different connotation than nursing student and its removal from our lexicon is long overdue. Some time ago I wrote a blog about nurses soaring like eagles. It is a parable about an eagle that finds itself in a chicken yard and starts to act like a chicken, rather than fulfilling its destiny and potential as an eagle.  I believe that by referring to nursing students as student nurses we are unwittingly reinforcing the many messages that the term connotes and are hindering their ability to soar like eagles.

                       

The ROI of Reflection


Research, write, revise, rinse, repeat. Meet, plan, do, re-do, rinse, repeat. Heavy patient loads, high acuity, diminishing resources, rinse, repeat. Hurry, hurry, hurry, rinse, repeat. Sound familiar? Is your head spinning? For many of us, it is a constant state of being – the whirlwind of life. We get caught up in it and often, it is a necessary adjustment to make. But what if we stopped briefly, for an intentional moment or two? What if we stopped to take in the beauty of life around us, the big picture, a few cleansing breaths? What is the return on investment (ROI) of reflection or contemplation?

Of course reflective and contemplative practices are not new. Most societies have reflectionpracticed different formal and informal forms of reflection and contemplation for centuries. The best examples are the spiritual and prayerful practices of the world’s religions. More attention is being given today to all forms of reflection and contemplative practices as credible and evidence-based ways to reduce anxiety, PTSD, depression, and aggression to name only a few. Similarly, reflective practices can increase feelings of well-being and focus. The benefits of practices like mindfulness based stress reduction are becoming widely known and practiced, for example.

But what if you are already happy, content, focused, and have no pathological mental health concerns? Can you still benefit from reflective practices? At this point, refer back to the opening scenarios – the ones that left your head spinning. Happy and mentally intact, we all feel the crush of stress from time to time. Writer’s block? Stressful. Compassion fatigue? Stressful. High patient loads? Stressful. Deadlines? Stressful. Negative feedback? Stressful. High stakes presentations? Stressful. Proposals? Stressful. The list goes on… At the risk of sounding like a 1960’s television advertisement, I propose an intentional reflective practice to keep the stress at bay and guarantee a positive return on investment.

A quick peruse of the academic databases support the ROI of reflection, and while I could take a very academic approach to this blog post, I will leave that to those who are doing the research. This is purely anecdotal and I stand by the guarantee. The pathway to an intentional reflective practice occurs in many forms: formal prayer, physical activity, cooking, meditation, playing with children, connecting with loved ones, gardening, listening to music, giving to those in need, etc. Cultivating a daily practice of intentional reflection takes time and commitment (a few minutes will work; a few hours is a luxury). The goal is to empty the mind of constant chatter, connect to the breath, connect to the wonder of all things greater than self, connect to the positive, and connect to the belief that all is well.

For me, as my colleagues well know, the ROI of reflection comes in the form of daily walks in nature. It is where I find solitude, wholeness, hope, and beauty. It is where I find the ‘crystal moments’ – those moments of pure connection and energy. In the whirlwind of a very busy life, the ROI of reflection manifests as stress reduction, clear insights, moments of peace, feelings of well-being, hope, mental fortitude, and improved long-term productivity. Moments taken to contemplate and reflect – the return is well worth the investment. Of course, some stressors require direct action and cannot fully be controlled or alleviated without coordinated and persistent effort. However, an intentional reflective practice can help manage stressors and enhance the ability to craft feasible solutions and outcomes. Breathing in and breathing out. The ROI of reflection – guaranteed.

References

Farb, N., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Gard, T., Kerr, C., Dunn, B. D., . . . Mehling, W. E. (2015). Interoception, contemplative practice, and health. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(6). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00763

Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297-314. doi:10.1080/02699930302297

Polusny, M. A., Erbes, C. R., Thuras, P., Moran, A., Lamberty, G. J., Collins, R. C., . . . Lim, K. O. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for posttraumatic stress disorder among veterans: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 314(5), 456-465. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8361

Ray, M. A., Turkel, M. C., & Cohn, J. (2011). Relational caring complexity: The study of caring and complexity in health care hospital organizations. In A. W. Davidson, M. A. Ray, M. C. Turkel, A. W. Davidson, M. A. Ray, & M. C. Turkel (Eds.), Nursing, caring, and complexity science: For human–environment well-being. (pp. 95-117). New York, NY, US: Springer Publishing Co.

Wayment, H. A., Wiist, B., Sullivan, B. M., & Warren, M. A. (2011). Doing and being: Mindfulness, health, and quiet ego characteristics among Buddhist practitioners. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(4), 575-589. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9218-6

Reclaiming Holistic Nursing


Jane Dickinson’s wonderful post of February 24th, “Replacing words that shame and blame in nursing care” touched on one of my own favorite topics – the words we use!  Our language is steeped in euphemisms – particularly where medicine and health are concerned.  Years ago Jo Ann Ashley often pointed out ways that the term “health care system” is a misnomer – it should be call “Sickness” or “disease” care system.  Even our conception of “prevention” is distorted, in that very little actual prevention happens. holisticLens Mostly, the activites that this term refers to is “disease detection” – not prevention.  With the exception of the development and use of vaccines, very little prevention happens.  Early detection of disease is a good thing, of course, and can “prevent” progression of disease to an advanced stage, but this is not prevention.

The term “holistic” is particularly important to consider where nursing is concerned.  Wholism (my preferred spelling) is, in my view, is one of the foundational values that distinguishes nursing as a discipline.  From this point of the view, the term “holistic nursing” could be seen as redundant. However, now the term “holistic nursing” is taken to refer to a nursing speciality that draws on complementary or alternative healing modalities.  We do need a term to refer to this particular focus, but it seems to me that even someone whose practice includes a complementary modality does not necessarily mean that it is wholistic, in terms of the extent the nurse takes into account not only the whole person, but the family, envieonment and social determinants of health.  Given the nature of the modalities we refer to as “complimentary” or even “holistic,” it is likely that the practice is indeed more “wholistic” than many medicalized specialties, but it is still too easy, in many of the contexts in which nurses work, to be overly focused on a part, not the whole.

I would be very interested in your thoughts and ideas on this!  Reaching for that which is “whole” is not easy, and is made more difficult in the contexts of specialization, and our language is a barrier as well. So share you thoughts and insights here – let’s have a discussion!

Replacing words that shame and blame in nursing care


The last time I wrote about language and health, specifically diabetes, I mentioned several words that impart judgment, shame and blame. People with diabetes live with and manage a demanding and challenging disease. When we use words like non-compliant or poorly controlled we are not taking into consideration all the factors that could be at play. Can the person afford insulin? Are they experiencing food insecurity? Did they ever receive diabetes education? What is their level of health literacy?

Two weeks ago I gave a talk about the messages we send to children and adolescents at diabetes camp. I discussed how we can send messages of judgment, or messages of strength and hope, simply based on the words we choose. Empowering campers is the work of diabetes camp professionals and volunteers. For nurses outside of the camp setting, the focus is also on empowering people – in hospitals, clinics, home care, public health, academics, etc.

At the end of my presentation, there was some discussion. The people in the room who live with diabetes strongly agreed with my suggestions about language and messaging. However, two people (who happen to be health care professionals) raised the point that “there are times when it’s necessary to use words like uncontrolled, good and bad.” They argued that doing otherwise is not giving good care. One of them also shared that she thought my talk was judgmental. At the break another participant came up to me and said she agrees that these words are not “PC.”

My first response to these comments was concern. I am clearly not using effective messaging about messaging if this is how people respond! Then after thinking about this feedback for several days I realized that it was very important for me to hear these points. This is how I can do a better job explaining what I’m trying to say. If I come across as judging people for using certain words, that absolutely defeats my purpose. If I come across as not giving good care by avoiding certain words, that’s not my intent either. And if we are simply thinking of the words we use in health care as “PC” or “not PC,” then we are not looking at the underlying problem. And isn’t that what we learned back in nursing school? (Look at the underlying problem, don’t just treat the symptoms.)

So my approach to all this is to go back to the problem, which is using language that is not appropriate for chronic care. Patients in 2016 are demanding holistic, person-centered care – and language is part of that care. Words create a context for people, and through that context people create meaning. So if they hear words that make them feel judged, they are likely to translate that into “I’m a bad person.” If they hear poorly controlled they may feel they are a failure.

Some ways we can change the messages we send to people include using words that put the person first: woman who has diabetes, people living with diabetes, or child with diabetes, instead of diabetic. We can use words that build on people’s strengths, rather than their weaknesses: takes her medication about half the time, rather than she’s non-compliant. And we can use words that focus on physiology, rather than judgment: blood glucose levels in the target range, elevated A1C, glycemic variability, glycemic stability, or blood glucose management, instead of any version of control.

When a patient has blood glucose levels that are clearly not in a safe or healthy range, we can start by asking questions. How do they feel about it? Find out what they know or don’t know. What are their resources? Ask if it’s ok to make some suggestions or share some guidance. Acknowledge that it’s hard and scary. This is how we can give good care and empower people. It doesn’t require judgment or judgmental words to help people make changes.

By focusing on sending messages that are person-centered and strengths-based, words that are consistent with those approaches will naturally follow. We can’t change the history of health care, or the words that went with it. But we can change the messages we send going forward.

Book of the Year Award – twice!


On September 14, 2014, I posted news of the newly published book “Philosophies and Practices of Emancipatory Nursing: Social Justice as Praxis,”  noting its relevance for all NurseManifesters!  The book is edited by Paula Kagan, Marlaine Smith, and Peggy Chinn, and contains 22 original chapters by some of the leading nurse scholars in the area of Emancipatory textcritical inquiry.  The book has gained some attention, but in January, it was awarded two AJN “Book of the Year” awards – in the categories of History and Public Policy, and in Professional Issues.  You can see the press release about all of the awards here.  The link to. the article online is here.  The detailed comments of the reviewers are posted on the web as supplementary digital content; you can access this information online as a subscriber, or through your library.  The book is available in both paper and electronic formats – here is the Amazon link!

We are thrilled with these awards, not just because we know how important this book it, but because it is amazing for a book of this type to gain this kind of recognition in a “field” that typically focuses on very pragmatic and even “technical” topics.  Both of the reviewers who selected the book in their category commented on how accessible the content of the book is, even though much of the focus is on complex philosophic ideas.  If you have not yet had a chance to see the book, consider asking your library for a copy, and take some time to browse, and read!  Share your comments here about the details you see as particularly important for manifesting nursing!