The Future of Nursing revisited

The editorial printed in this quarter’s Journal of Nursing Scholarship takes a look at where we are with nursing one year (and change) after the Institute of Medicine’s Future of Nursing report. Susan Gennaro discusses changes that are being made toward the four keyNurse Symbol areas called for in the “landmark report”:

  • ensuring that nurses are able to practice to the full extent of their education and experience
  • removing educational barriers
  • ensuring that nurses practice collaboratively as full partners in the healthcare system
  • establishing infrastructure to ensure that data about the workforce is available to make decisions upon

Are these changes happening where you are? What are your observations, activities, thoughts on these changes and any progress or lack of progress you’ve experienced? What about the NurseManifest project – how does it fit with these proposed changes?

Genarro, S. (2012). The future of nursing: Accomplishments a year after the landmark report. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44(1), 1.

To Challenge and to Cooperate

Most readers of this blog are already aware of the IOM/Robert Wood Johnson report on the Future of Nursing that was issued in October of 2010.  You may recall my post about the report last June – in fact, there were 16 replies to that post – a record for this fledgling blog!  The replies were thoughtful and brought to the fore exactly what is most badly   needed in nursing – challenges about not only the report, but the assumptions underlying it.  So I would like for us to focus once again on this initiative, not simply because of the terrific discussion it raised on this blog, but because it is generating a substantial degree of action.  Part of the action component is built into the funding plan that accompanied the original report, which actually strengthen the possibility that something will come of it!  But of course the action components need to be watched closely.  The challenge for me, and I suspect for many others who entered the discussion in June, has to do with a fundamental question: “Who benefits?”

During the August conference of INANE (International Academy of Nursing Journal Editors) in San Francisco, the 130+ nursing journal editors and publishers heard a presentation by Susan Hassmiller, the Senior Advisor for Nursing for the Center to Champion Nursing in America.  In response to her presentation, the group decided to initiate a coordinated effort across as many nursing journals as possible, to further the possibilities for the achievement of the report’s recommendations.  So far, the INANE web site has a listing of editorials and resources that have appeared in various nursing journals over the past year or so; in the spring of 2012, many of the journals will carry focused messages about the report, articles, and other content that provides evidence and resources for their readers in moving forward.  I would encourage folks to browse this list … it is impressive, and many of the editorials are well worth looking up and reading.  Also, if you want to see Susan Hassmiller’s presentation from the INANE conference, you can find it here (scroll down to the Friday 8:00 session).

So my question for readers of the Nurse Manifest blog: can we both challenge and cooperate?  I fully agree with many of the challenges that came forward in our discussion in June, including skepticism about the source of the report, and the fact that the report’s recommendations are in fact what we might call “lame.”  However, the cold hard truth is that the recommendations of the report, which of course should already be reality, are far from real.  If we were to achieve the report recommendations as reality, do we not have a better outlook for achieving not only the fundamental goal of better health care and better nursing care, but also the ideal of seeing nursing at the center of health care policy-making.  If we simply sit on the sidelines and challenge the report, then we isolate ourselves from the places where mainstream change might be possible.  If we simply cooperate with the report without questioning some of the assumptions and directions, then we ourselves may all too easily be drawn into an abyss of the status quo.  So bottom line, to me, there is no simple way forward.  But I favor moving forward, challenging ideas and actions where possible to be heard, and with as much cooperation as possible with those who follow a more mainstream path than many of us follow!

Future of Nursing

A landmark report on the FUTURE OF NURSING was issued last fall by the Institute of Medicine and the Robert Wood Johnson (RWJ) Foundation.  There are four major recommendations:

  • Nurses should practice to the full extent of their education and training.
  • Nurses should achieve higher levels of education and training through anNurse Symbol improved education system that promotes seamless academic progression.
  • Nurses should be full partners, with physicians and other health care professionals, in redesigning health care in the United States.
  • Effective workforce planning and policy making require better data collection and information infrastructure.
Each of these recommendations are framed in language that is well suited to public policy-making, but if we read these recommendations from a “Nurse Manifest” lens, they take on even greater importance!  Take, for example, the idea of “full extent of [our] education and training.”  If nursing education reaches the ideals that we have set forth in the “Manifesto” where education is concerned, all of health care could be radically re-invented!  

I believe that more nurses than we imagine have ideals about nursing that are very similar to the values that we described on the initial web site.  Let’s brainstorm ways we can better connect with the “Future of Nursing” initiatives going on all around the U.S., and keep these values in the forefront!